India to file 16 cases against US for WTO treaty violation

Source: The Times of India | May 11, 2016
Representative image

HIGHLIGHTS

  1. India will file 16 cases against the US for violating WTO treaties.
  2. Certain programmes of US in the renewable energy sector termed “inconsistent” with global norms.
  3. India has appealed before the WTO appellate body on the recommendations of the dispute settlement panel.
NEW DELHI: India will file 16 cases against the US for violating World Trade Organization ( WTO ) treaties as certain programmes of the United States in the renewable energy sector are “inconsistent” with global norms, Parliament was informed on Wednesday.Commerce and industry minister Nirmala Sitharaman replied in positive to a question in the Rajya Sabha that “whether it is a fact that the government is going to file 16 cases against the US for violating WTO treaties”.

She said that India believes that certain renewable energy programmes of the US at the sub-federal level are inconsistent with WTO provisions, particularly with respect to the obligation under GATT (General Agreement on Tariff and Trade) 1994, Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and/or TRIMS (Trade-Related Investment Measures) Agreement.

In a separate reply, she said India has appealed before the WTO appellate body on the findings and recommendations of the dispute settlement panel.

To promote domestic manufacturing of solar cells and modules, which is one of the components of the National Solar Mission, India set domestic content requirement for a few of the programmes under the mission.

In a separate reply, the minister said India continues to be placed on the priority watch list under the US Special 301 on account of US assessment of Indian intellectual property rights (IPR) protection being inadequate.

“The Special 301 report issued by the US under their Trade Act of 1974 is a unilateral measure to create pressure on countries to enhance IPR protection beyond the TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) Agreement,” she added.

She made a point that the report which is an “extra territorial application” of the domestic law of a country is inconsistent with established norms of WTO.

Last month, releasing its annual 301 Report, the US has said it will continue to put India and China on its priority watch list for IPR.

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized, WTO. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s