Category Archives: Compulsory Licensing

An Access Regime based on Indian Patents Act -Review Of “The Access Regime” by Feroz Ali

Source: LiveLaw.in Even though the Agreement on the trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights (TRIPS) set the minimum standards of protection and enforcement of intellectual property (IP) rights, it could not harmonise the various national patent laws. Irrespective of the … Continue reading

Posted in Compulsory Licensing, FTA, Patent Opposition, Sec 3 (d), TRIPS, TRIPS flexibilities, TRIPS plus, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Trump Executive Order on drug prices: not what was promised nor needed, and contrary to US self interest

Source: Medium Emily Kopp has a big scoop for Kaiser Health News. She has obtained a six page document outlining the draft provisions or objectives of a proposed Presidential Executive Order (EO) on drug prices. She has shared some of … Continue reading

Posted in Compulsory Licensing, Data Exclusivity, Evergreening, IPR Enforcement, Special 301 report, Uncategorized, UNHLP report, US Pressure | Leave a comment

June 2017 Alert: Pressure on countries hiked by US on IP

The US government is stepping up on TRIPS plus pressure through bilateral forums based on a US law that passed under Obama to strengthen IPR enforcement and the 301 process. Countries targeted include India, Indonesia, China, Thailand, Ukraine in Asia … Continue reading

Posted in Compulsory Licensing, Data Exclusivity, Evergreening, IPR Enforcement, Special 301 report, Uncategorized, UNHLP report, US Pressure | Leave a comment

TRIPS Council Members: Defining IP Rights And The Public Interest

Source: IPWatch “Political and economic pressure placed on governments to forgo the use of TRIPS flexibilities violates the integrity and legitimacy of the system of legal duties and rights created by the TRIPS agreement and as reaffirmed by the Doha … Continue reading

Posted in Compulsory Licensing, TRIPS, TRIPS flexibilities, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

FOIFOIA documents. In 2015 Novartis asked U.S. Dept of Commerce to Pressure Colombia Against Compulsory License on Glivec

In February 2016, KEI submitted a FOIA to USTR requesting “all correspondence and notes sent internally by the Office of the US Trade Representative as well as with Colombian government officials, other foreign government officials, and non-governmental persons or entities … Continue reading

Posted in Compulsory Licensing, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

TRIPS Council Members: Defining IP Rights And The Public Interest

Source: IP Watch 15/06/2017 BY CATHERINE SAEZ, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WATCH “Political and economic pressure placed on governments to forgo the use of TRIPS flexibilities violates the integrity and legitimacy of the system of legal duties and rights created by the … Continue reading

Posted in Compulsory Licensing, Doha Declaration, HIV/Aids, TRIPS, US pressure on India | Leave a comment

Eli Lilly’s ISDS Patent Claim against Canada Defeated

In an unprecedented case, Eli Lilly initiated an amended investor-state-dispute-settlement (ISDS) claim against the government of Canada in 2013 after Canada’s highest courts upheld invalidations on new therapeutic use patents for two chemical compounds – olanzapine and atomoxetine, the active … Continue reading

Posted in Compulsory Licensing, FTA, Investor state dispute, Uncategorized | Leave a comment